The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
as time goes on presumably two things are working against an aging individual one of them not pathological one pathological so the non-pathological is you just have a greater reservoir of memories and your brain might be selectively choosing how to prioritize new encounters and new memories with some understanding that there's you know the denominator keeps growing and I have to be selective
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.