Rhonda Patrick· PhD
So it's nice that things have come full circle and we've got a better understanding of what's going on there.
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So it's nice that things have come full circle and we've got a better understanding of what's going on there.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So, you're not only increasing things that help proteins keep their three-dimensional structure, but you're increasing antioxidant pathways and anti-inflammatory, just a whole host of things and autophagy, wanting to get rid of or clear away damaged proteins, damaged cells.