The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
but my my use of it personally just stems from the mood elevation and if it you know so so believing that it has no benefit on my ability to reduce the risk of cancer heart disease or dementia just the mood elevation alone for me seems to be reason enough
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
but my my use of it personally just stems from the mood elevation and if it you know so so believing that it has no benefit on my ability to reduce the risk of cancer heart disease or dementia just the mood elevation alone for me seems to be reason enough