The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if you had a colonoscopy every one to two years the likelihood that you could ever develop a colon cancer while maybe not zero is so remote that you could effectively take colon cancer off the list of the top 10 reasons why someone dies of cancer
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if you had a colonoscopy every one to two years the likelihood that you could ever develop a colon cancer while maybe not zero is so remote that you could effectively take colon cancer off the list of the top 10 reasons why someone dies of cancer