The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
i want to say maybe i'm paying 2 000 for a colonoscopy so that's a huge cost and then there's obviously the risk of the sedation which again is not zero in the hands of someone who's doing this every minute of every day it's very small and then of course there's the risk of perforation which again is also incredibly small especially in a healthy individual
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
there are risks of bowel preps right you can you know do these you do a bow prep prep in a person who's significantly older who runs risks from the electrolyte abnormalities that come from those things all of those things have to I I certainly wouldn't want my 86-year-old dad getting a colonoscopy under any circumstance that ship is sailed right he the bow prep alone could injure him let alone the sedation of it so so one has to be very thoughtful and measured in how they think about doing these things
there's the risk of dehydration electrolyte imbalance hypotension that comes from the bow prep there's the risk of the sedation and then there's the risk of a perforation or bleeding actual procedural risks