The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
but there was all these papers that if you read them there aren't too many of them you can piece together the information and you can get a sense that this is RNA guided DNA targeting and cleaving enzyme and U and at the time there were other Gene editing systems that were being worked on by researchers in the field something called Zing finger nucleas or or Talon and and these are systems that use proteins to recognize DNA but not using RNA to recognize DNA
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.