The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
but the challenge is that they weren't very efficient and it was also difficult to apply them uh to be able to treat the disease uh with sufficient amount of efficacy when chrisper came along um especially with cast 9 um it was much easier uh to be able to uh design strategies to to edit DNA and uh and and and that made it much more um feasible for many many groups to to really start to work on this idea
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.