We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
all the supposed greatness is really questionable just at the bench science like they don't even know their technique and whether it's truly reflective of anything the body so you can and this is a case where you really do need human trials and even human trials are so fraught with too many variables that you can't control
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
we have thought of curcumin as a very valuable molecule mostly based on in vitro studies that are probably not going to translate that don't appear to translate clinically into meaningful effects for humans