Paul Saladino· MD
we assume that plants are benevolent when in fact they want you dead or at least they don't want you to eat them and so they are making chemicals to dissuade you from doing that
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
we assume that plants are benevolent when in fact they want you dead or at least they don't want you to eat them and so they are making chemicals to dissuade you from doing that
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.