We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
okay that doesn't really mean anything we don't know if that has any clinical implication other than the fact that hey these kirkhumanoids are going to change the way your gut microbiota looks this to me is an overly uh inflated result and doesn't really have any clinical significance yet we don't know what these changes in the gut microbiota mean
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.