The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
no not everyone I don't think needs curcumin I think it depends on what their ABCs are you know if they have some inflammatory stuff well I'm not checking the right inflammatory stuff so I can't use that as a biomarker they have some memory stuff well maybe if they're at higher risk and they have any belief or gene maybe it was the dose
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.