We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
curcumin is often used as an anti-inflammatory and I would say well why are you trying to get rid of inflammation without understanding what the cause of the inflammation is so we don't need curcumin to not have inflammation in our bodies and in some settings reactive oxygen species oxidative stress are needed for proper molecular signaling we don't want to get rid of that completely
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.