Peter Attia· MD
two years after the book was published there's been a meta-analysis that's now shown that it's not 30 to 40 percent in fact in prospective studies it's 45 and so we've been able to correct that in the book
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
two years after the book was published there's been a meta-analysis that's now shown that it's not 30 to 40 percent in fact in prospective studies it's 45 and so we've been able to correct that in the book
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.