The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so those are the four things you get when you do a dexa and of course all of these things you want to see how you stack up against a population and that population is typically stratified by your sex and by your age so therefore we have nomograms for each of these things and that's how we present the data to a patient and that's how we therefore make decisions about you know where you rank and what you need to do
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
a dexa scan will either automatically calculate for you or at least give you the data to calculate for yourself something called the almi and the ffmi