The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and the rationale for it instead of using an estrogen local product and we'll maybe we'll have a few minutes to get into that is that there are mixed receptors in the genitals that need both estrogen and androgen so it gets metabolized into both androgens and then eventually to estrogens in the at the intracellular level that's the theory of it right
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and the rationale for it instead of using an estrogen local product and we'll maybe we'll have a few minutes to get into that is that there are mixed receptors in the genitals that need both estrogen and androgen so it gets metabolized into both androgens and then eventually to estrogens in the at the intracellular level that's the theory of it right