The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so it doesn't have a blackbox warning right which we'll also have to get into and so some people like just like not seeing that warning right and the blackbox warning with with the estrogen is around breast cancer or clots it h so it has to do with both endometrial and breast cancer and Vascular thr thromboembolism
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and sometimes it's someone like my mother had breast cancer I don't want any hormones but I'll use I won't use estrogen but they'll use this and there's no real rationale there's no proof that it's any more or less likely to cause any cancer at all yeah right
the other issue is that in cancer P cancer survivors it doesn't have the black box so sometimes oncologists and again that's a whole a discussion we could have whether they're worried unnecessarily