We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
so just fiber here I would say fiber is not a nutrient for humans fiber is at best net zero it's maybe not harming us and at worst Farber fiber is clearly detrimental to humans in terms of constipation in terms of dysbiosis in terms of hormonal changes and in terms of mineral and vitamin bioavailability
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.