The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
over time these animals got really fat they got insulin resistant everything but you had to over feed them glucose we put the glucose in their drinking water so they were drinking a lot of glucose but they would eat less chow so we gave them chao and glucose in their drinking water and their chow had it was normal chow it wasn't the high fat high sugar chow no just regular chop and these animals started getting really really fat
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
when we blocked their fructose metabolism they're eating the same amount of glucose no change exactly suddenly they're not getting as fat they have no fatty liver they're not insulin resistant