Paul Saladino· MD
as you point out humans will never consume fructose without glucose so any study that's doing that is just kind of uh an inaccurate model of what we're doing here
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
as you point out humans will never consume fructose without glucose so any study that's doing that is just kind of uh an inaccurate model of what we're doing here
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.