The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
when fructose is metabolized there's this process that causes the energy in the cell to fall before it goes up so normally when you eat a calorie when you eat any kind of nutrient we use it to make energy that's what we do but when you eat fructose the energy in the cell falls before it goes up it's the only nutrient that lowers energy in the cell
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and actually you know turns on you know through sort of a an odd metabolism actually turns on the warburg effect and allows sort of atp to go down and then glucose to flow in
it's this lowering of um of atp in the process of metabolizing fructose and it's that um that adp atp sort of switch that that can drive the hyper influx of glucose and that's not necessarily an insulin driven phenomenon
it's this lowering of um of atp in the process of metabolizing fructose and it's that um that adp atp um sort of switch that that can drive the hyper influx of glucose and that's not necessarily an insulin driven phenomenon
why is it that fructose metabolism is kind of unique from a nutrient standpoint in terms of creating this transient intracellular energy deficit