Paul Saladino· MD
it's much more about understanding where the insulin resistance is coming from how much fructose you're eating are you drinking alcohol and improving those things than it is about decreasing your meat consumption
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it's much more about understanding where the insulin resistance is coming from how much fructose you're eating are you drinking alcohol and improving those things than it is about decreasing your meat consumption
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I think it's something else the insulin resistance that's driving that and I don't think that it's a direct correlation between meat and purines and organs and purines in the human diet or fructose from fruit in the human diet and this is what I'm driving at but I don't think those things are raising uric acid and it's just nutritional reductionism all over again