The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so we know for example that the naked mole rat which lives in burrows very low oxygen bureaus they make fructose to survive when they're in those bureaus so suddenly the fructose goes up in their blood and they use it to survive the low oxygen tension there because they switch from mitochondrial metabolism to glycolysis
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
his example which really fascinated me was that these naked mole rats don't know if you remember this but yeah they live in this low oxygen environment and they they run a lot of warburg metabolism by converting glucose to fructose and then using the fructose to drive the warburg effect