The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
namely if you can revert The epig genome to a version that existed earlier can you take the phenotype back with you and that could be at the tissue level as you say could I make my my joints feel the way they did 25 years ago
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
namely if you can revert The epig genome to a version that existed earlier can you take the phenotype back with you and that could be at the tissue level as you say could I make my my joints feel the way they did 25 years ago um could it make you know my te- cells function as they did 25 years ago uh and obviously one can extrapolate from this and think of the entire organism