The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So there's 30,000 genes. That's the current number that people... I've got to update my estimate. I've been saying 2025. Yeah, so this is... Coding versus non-coding. Coding versus non-coding. So, and that's still, even if you include non-coding, true genes, you still have a lot of in-between material. A ton, a ton. The vast majority of base pairs are... function not determined, essentially.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.