Peter Attia· MD
so if that's true in humans and no one's proven that that's true in humans it could explain a lot of the things that we do see
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so if that's true in humans and no one's proven that that's true in humans it could explain a lot of the things that we do see
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
we know from animal work from both children's of Philadelphia and also from the leggins Institute in New Zealand that maternal hyperglycemia causes epigenetic changes this is in utero in utero causes changes in h19 the different epigenetic markers that we have on chromosomes that then portend metabolic dysfunction later on