The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if you look at what people call the Hallmarks of Aging right these sort of famous nine things molecular conserved um processes that that seem to contribute to aging only one of them is is epigenetics and so I think you run the risk with the epigenetic clocks that you're only informing on a subset of the biological aging processes
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
epigenetic changes are part of biological aging this again is a different question but if we look at the Hallmarks of Aging epigenetic disregulation is one of the 12