The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
but he recently published a universal clock and another group at Harvard published a universal clock for mice which means it doesn't matter if I give you a blood sample or skin sample or a brain sample by looking at that precise location on the genome next to gene X and you look at 300 of them all so then you can actually say exactly what age that Mouse is independent of what part of that Mouse you're given that's kind of amazing
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.