Rhonda Patrick· PhD
Second thing you gotta remember is that that's a good thing, because it means you've got some variation to actually work with.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Second thing you gotta remember is that that's a good thing, because it means you've got some variation to actually work with.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Now, what does all that actually mean? Well, first of all, you've got to remember that actually if you look in the adult part of life, let's say 23 to 70 or 80, then the R-squared is much lower. It's like 70%, something like that.