Paul Saladino· MD
you are m2 Jabbar 677 homozygous which is setting you up for an 80% decrease in function of unity to our gene so that means an 80% less ability to transform one aspect of fully into the body's number one form of folate
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
you are m2 Jabbar 677 homozygous which is setting you up for an 80% decrease in function of unity to our gene so that means an 80% less ability to transform one aspect of fully into the body's number one form of folate
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
for the worst case for MTHFR is the c6 70 70 homozygous homozygous a or homozygous 440 instead of yeah yeah yeah so it's the TT and then on the a one two nine eight C it's like yeah for the a12 98 see that one is less significant than the c6