The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if a mother is under great stress there was this critical window in which her child could see something in her eyes that would communicate that stress to her or maybe it wasn't in her eyes might have been just through her entire face but it would imprint epigenetically into the child and alter many features about them as they would age for example their propensity to be depressed
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.