Peter Attia· MD
Essentially, what these clocks are is a regression analysis onto, you know, you start with a variable, which is your age, and you regress each methylation site onto onto the age.
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Essentially, what these clocks are is a regression analysis onto, you know, you start with a variable, which is your age, and you regress each methylation site onto onto the age.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
How how much is AI facilitating this at this point? I mean, machine learning is is a key instrument. Essentially, what these clocks are is a regression analysis onto, you know, you start with a variable, which is your age, and you regress each methylation site onto onto the age.