The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
my calculus on this is looking at a few things and you know obviously quality of life is one bone health is another muscle mass brain health is a huge one so I'm kind of looking at it as heart health is not even on the radar because to your point we have so many better tools to reduce the risk of ascvd that we don't need to rely on estradiol as one of those tools
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.