The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if a woman stays on estradiol for the duration of her life say from age 50 to 80. we accept that there's going to be an increase in the incidence of breast cancer though it doesn't seem to translate to a difference in lifespan but on the flip side we are reducing her risk of fracture during a very dangerous window
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.