The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
katsu is pretty rigid about saying to the limited for 15 minutes on the arms because they don't want any damage because there is you know the is is bfr safe because there's a concern about deep vein thrombosis and that can be deadly you can cause a PE and take you out but this actually we believe decreases your risk of DVT
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.