The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
we look at the cardiorespiratory adaptations to exercise and we look at the uh cellular adaptations to exercise do they really correspond right uh we know very well that with with with athletes um um um you know you can improve tremendously at the cellular level but not at all at the cardiorespiratory level at least at least based on V2 Max which is the representative of the cardio respiratory adaptations to exercise right
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.