The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
If the first motion you do is push the sled and you put, you know, tear your Achilles, I'm like, well, that tissue wasn't as prepared maybe as it could have been. Maybe we could have mitigated some of these aches and tweaks. Maybe some of those insertions of those connective tissues weren't so, you know, fryable and dry.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.