The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
okay so let's start with the name powder he's progressed to this this exercise is really hard so you don't need a lot of tonnage the goal here make sure the angle is sorry a little bit down good great give me 10 controlled eccentrics stopping just north of neutral beautiful i like it one second hold at the top three seconds down and then one second back up
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so now a lot of times people will do too many reps in a row or they don't give enough recovery time between sets so on this one i think we go upwards of 90 seconds 60 90 seconds for cover
what i like about this slow eccentric is it's just so much time under attention i'm in a such a safe range and it's a great opportunity to kind of talk about dosage a day like today where we did a ton of cuff isolation a great deal of rotator cuff activity and global movement and then we're finishing with this major burnout for these tendons