The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and you know the normal range of recommended weight is twenty to forty percent and I'd say 20 to 30 and I'm in when I write the paper because I just wrote a paper for journalists or anything conditioning on this it's like 25 pages and 250 references and the I say you just go to 20 percent I mean did you crate I don't think it's foolish to go beyond 20 percent but you know when you're competitive and you're an athlete you want to do more but more is not better
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.