The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
they have logs and sometimes they'll squat on a log but when they're quote sitting their butt is lower than their knees so they're in like a semi squat position and they're you know they're either cross-legged or they're squatting
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
they definitely squat by necessity and sometimes they would have a log on the ground that was eight to ten inches high but they would essentially be deep squatting onto a log or they would be cross-legged and when they were super welcoming what they would do is they would just bring over a deerskin or an animal skin put it on the dirt and they'd be like here and that's like them saying here have a seat on my couch yeah a hod's a couch is a deer skin on the dirt
on average they would be in resting positions active resting positions for i believe it was it was i think it was 9.82 hours so like 9 to 10 hours a day which is pretty darn consistent with western culture or industrialized cultures the difference was the manner in which they were resting you know so they are kneeling they are squatting they are you know maybe in like a sukhasana like a cross-legged position