The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so if there's there's some type of of torque happening in your spine in your ribs that doesn't allow that diaphragm to actually fully engage and fully depress to pull those lungs then mechanically you're not going to be able to get that full breath until you communicate in with this impingement or restriction that's happening around the ribs
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.