The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
so you get a sense of like 15 met hours per week is but by extension i do about a hundred met hours per week of exercise yeah i think of everything in terms of med hours but the point is that you can get depending on the study 30 to 50 of the benefit going from being completely sedentary to 15 met hours per week is pretty amazing
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if we added 3 hours a week to your training or to my training it actually wouldn't have an enormous impact
the greatest effect of exercise is generally seen in the person who goes from being completely sedentary to even a mild amount of training
the greatest effect of exercise is generally seen in the person who goes from being completely sedentary to even a mild amount of training
the biggest reduction in risk bar none is always going from nothing to doing something.