The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
a study that was done looking at a regular shoe partial minimal shoe and a minimal shoe over the course of a training cycle of 12 weeks the partial minimal shoe had twice the injuries as the minimal shoe and the authors suggest that it may be and they didn't look at biomechanics but it may be because the partial minimal shoe they still were heel striking but now you have less cushioning
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.