The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So, what he was doing is he was putting you in very specific positions to where you had to load something where neurologically your brain says, "I'm going to turn this other thing off and I got to actually meet the demand of this force because force is how your nervous system responds." And so he was loading one direction so much that eventually that QL or whatever else could have been spasming with you had to eventually kind of melt and let go.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.