The reason for this temporary decline in immune cell numbers in the bloodstream is because immune cells travel to other tissues like the lungs because they go there to look for infections.
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
The reason for this temporary decline in immune cell numbers in the bloodstream is because immune cells travel to other tissues like the lungs because they go there to look for infections.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
During exercise, some immune cell numbers in the bloodstream increase dramatically but decrease immediately after exercise and then return to normal several hours later.
The increase of immune cells is due to the immune cells being pulled off of the edges of blood vessels by the increased blood flow and pressure. Afterwards, the decrease is due to redistribution of immune cells to various tissues and out of the bloodstream. This has been shown in mice where fluorescent cell tracking showed immune T-cell numbers rise during bouts of exercise, but then were redistributed primarily to the lung and other areas like the small intestine. If anything, the immune surveillance is actually heightened during the period where a few immune cells are measured in the blood. As a result, the mechanism behind the J-shaped curve of respiratory infection and exercise duration is not due to the number of immune cells in the blood.