The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so again the brain just starts to do its job which we need air we're going to use these guys to get the air but and it's a good short term kind of survival strategy b but if we do it often enough that becomes the go-to pattern so you'll see a change in respiratory pattern meaning decreased utilization of full expansion of the diaphragm and more of a pattern of over utilizing the accessory breathing musculature
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.