The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there are some conditions around the hip that we can change the natural history to it seems that we can where we can reshape the hip a bit so it's not banging into itself as much that's called femoral acetabular impingement and that seems to be a place where we can be make a difference in terms of long term outcomes of those patients by reshaping the hip to some degree
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.