The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
when you look at the studies that have been done what they found is that when you match the foot to the shoe so a motion control shoe for a very low flat foot that's flexible a cushion shoe for a high arch rigid foot and stability shoe for normal arch and then you compare that to a group of people who all got the same shoe regardless their foot type there was no difference in the injury patterns
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.