Peter Attia· MD
um so maybe that's you know I don't know that's the right way to think about it um well let's maybe let's just start there so let's say someone starts at nothing so you're saying okay start at three hours a week
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
um so maybe that's you know I don't know that's the right way to think about it um well let's maybe let's just start there so let's say someone starts at nothing so you're saying okay start at three hours a week
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the minimum effective dose if you're doing nothing is not that much you you're gonna get huge benefits When you you know go from nothing to probably three hours a week that would be an enormous Improvement
so the minimum effective dose if you're doing nothing is not that much you're going to get huge benefits When you you know go from nothing to probably three hours a week that would be an enormous Improvement