if you multiply 0.95 by 0.95 by 092 by 0.9 by 095 enough you're down to 50% recovery within like six or eight weeks
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
if you multiply 0.95 by 0.95 by 092 by 0.9 by 095 enough you're down to 50% recovery within like six or eight weeks
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
every for the average person cranking away probably the person listening to this podcast one week out of every eight one week every two months don't go to the gym
once a year at least take two whole weeks like that we call that active rest
and once a year at least take two whole weeks like that we call that active rest so that first thing one week off is called a D lo and the second thing off where you take two weeks in a row of basically just not even coming to the gym and if you do just do the lightest easiest stuff ever takes 10 minutes that reduces your systemic cumulative fatigue so much that it brings it back down to zero or almost zero
one week out of every eight one week every two months don't go to the gym stay active maybe do a body weight squat or a push-up or two in your hotel room or something ideally try going on vacation if not try to not exercise and be a little easier at work be a little easier on family stuff Have Some Fun cheat Foods eat a little more than usual be a little less active so that your body can recover in a way that it can never recover between sessions but it gets a whole week to do this