The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
i'm probably one of the few people who tracks my met hours per week and i i don't spend like i don't do it down to the nat's ass i just mean i have a spreadsheet where i'm basically putting in my activity the amount of time i spend doing it at various different intensities and i can at the end of the week say look i'm doing you know 100 met hours per week
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
now i think it partially becomes relevant when you want to evaluate the research because the research you know has to be able to take into account not just how much time you're exercising but what's the intensity of that exercise